Thank you for your valuable feedback. No worries about disagreeing. I agree with your support of Nature article. Mainly fortunate academics like you and I who have institutional access to it could read it. Public cannot afford their price. I did not criticize the content and even praised it. You seem to missed nuances of my story. Nature does great job as a science publication giving us valuable perspectives with rigor but linking the article without essential details for the public is wrong. They usually give full abstract, method, results, and conclusion at least in PubMed or other indexing service but in this instance they failed which caused the public cry. As a fellow scientist I fully agree with those critical points you highlighted, which we cannot compromise. However a reputable and trustworthy publication like Nature to keep overt political side makes more harm than good. It is good to disagree and I appreciate the open dialogue with thought leaders like you.